Town Meeting Minute Issue 15 graphic about land-use outcomes, withdrawals, and new applications across CT and RI.
Town Meeting Minute • Issue #15

After the Verdicts: One Decision Sets the Next in Motion

Decision season delivered. Now comes the fallout. In the month since Issue #14, an affordable-housing subdivision was withdrawn on the day of its own meeting, a long-fought plan battle escalated with officials warning of impacts on hundreds of properties, a new wave of applications hit the Groton pipeline, and the region's most litigated commercial project finally got its hearing date — this Tuesday. The verdicts of August are becoming the applications, withdrawals, and showdowns of September.

New London County, CT Middlesex County, CT Washington County, RI Newport County, RI

Every land-use decision is also a starting gun. An adopted framework invites the first application under it. A continued hearing invites organized opposition to organize harder. A denial or a procedural fight invites a withdrawal — or a lawsuit. Issue #15 tracks what August's verdicts set in motion: the projects that pulled back, the projects that filed, the plans still being fought over line by line, and the one hearing this Tuesday that four years of litigation have been building toward.

Top Story

Tiverton's Seasons Corner Market — four years, one denial, one reversal, one Superior Court ruling, and ten special-use hearings later — opens its preliminary-plan public hearing at a special meeting this Tuesday, September 15.

Key Window

September 15 through mid-October — the Tiverton special meeting, Stonington's POCD endgame, Groton's new application reviews, and East Lyme's next regulatory moves all land in this stretch.

Big Theme

Fallout. Withdrawals, new filings, and escalating plan fights are the direct downstream consequences of decision season — and they are redrawing the region's supply pipeline in real time.

Last Updated: September 13, 2026

How to Use This Issue

Use this issue as a pipeline tracker. Several Issue #14 items have now resolved — a withdrawal in East Lyme, an approval in Groton, a hearing date in Tiverton — and each resolution changes what gets built, where, and when. The goal is to identify which pipelines are filling, which are emptying, and where the next thirty days offer a window to participate, comment, or reposition before outcomes harden into market facts.

Municipal hearing notices, vote records, and decision documents from land-use meetings.
The paper trail keeps moving: August's decisions are becoming September's filings, withdrawals, and hearing notices.

Status Tracker

Newport County RI

Tiverton

Item: Seasons Corner Market major land development (Colbea Enterprises)

Status: Preliminary-plan public hearing opens at a special meeting September 15

Next Step: Attend or watch Tuesday's special meeting; track testimony, conditions, plan revisions, and any stay sought by appealing abutters.

Who Should Watch: Commercial owners, corridor investors, neighbors, and retail-site operators.

New London County CT

Stonington

Item: 2026–2036 Plan of Conservation and Development

Status: Continued hearing held August 18; adoption endgame, with officials publicly debating property impacts

Next Step: Confirm the adoption vote and final amendment language via the Commission's minutes and the Town's POCD page.

Who Should Watch: Property owners, village stakeholders, conservation groups, housing advocates, and coastal owners.

New London County CT

Waterford

Item: PL-26-13 — 140 Waterford Parkway South town-initiated zoning map amendment

Status: Decision watch continues; no vote reported in regional press as of publication

Next Step: Confirm the Commission's action, effective date, and adopted map language once minutes post.

Who Should Watch: Landowners, developers, neighbors, housing advocates, industrial users, and investors.

New London County CT

East Lyme

Item: Holmes Road subdivision (Nehantic Highlands, 8-30g)

Status: Withdrawn — reported as pulled on the day of a Planning Commission meeting

Next Step: Watch for a refiled or redesigned application, and track the ongoing subdivision regulation revisions the project would have been reviewed under.

Who Should Watch: Builders, landowners, civil engineers, neighbors, and buyers watching future supply.

New London County CT

Groton — Commercial

Items: SIT26-0003 Credit Union Branch, 350 Long Hill Road — Approved; SPEC26-0003 Veritable Distillery Tasting Room, 3 Pearl Street — Pending

Status: Post-decision commercial pipeline moving

Next Step: Track the distillery special-permit hearing and further Long Hill Road corridor activity.

Who Should Watch: Mystic commercial owners, corridor investors, and hospitality operators.

New London County CT

Groton — New Filings

Items: IWA26-0005 The Grange at Mystic, 0 Noank Ledyard Road (wetlands review); CSP26-0001 Luther Fence addition, 145 Leonard Drive; IWA26-0006 Jones Residence modification, 183 Oslo Street

Status: Newly posted to the pending land-use page in September

Next Step: Track agency review schedules and referrals. See the disclosure note in the Groton section below.

Who Should Watch: Residential landowners, wetland scientists, engineers, and land-use counsel.

Washington County RI

Narragansett

Item: Comprehensive Plan Update (with the urban redevelopment plan and zoning ordinance also under council review)

Status: Drafting phase; consultant's draft frames a "town at a crossroads"

Next Step: Watch for fall chapter drafts, the housing strategy language, and workshop scheduling.

Who Should Watch: Coastal property owners, investors, rental owners, and municipal leaders.

New London County CT

New London & Norwich

Item: Municipal Redevelopment Authority membership and housing growth zones

Status: Regional housing-finance positioning continues

Next Step: Watch for certified zone boundaries near transit hubs and downtowns, and the first funded projects.

Who Should Watch: Downtown property owners, transit-adjacent landowners, and multifamily developers.

Document Links to Watch

These are the source links readers can use to go deeper. Where possible, we link directly to hearing notices, pending-application pages, application materials, and independent reporting. Municipalities frequently update packets, minutes, videos, and decision notices after meetings, so these links should be revisited.

Tiverton

Stonington

Groton

Waterford

East Lyme

Narragansett

New London & Norwich

Old Saybrook / Middletown / Westerly

The Short Version

Issue #15 is about consequences. Tiverton's Seasons Corner Market gets its long-awaited preliminary-plan hearing Tuesday night — the culmination of a four-year procedural war. Stonington's POCD fight has escalated beyond ordinary public comment, with officials themselves debating whether the plan would negatively affect hundreds of properties. East Lyme's Holmes Road affordable subdivision was abruptly withdrawn — a real subtraction from the regional housing pipeline. Groton's post-decision pipeline is refilling with commercial approvals and fresh residential filings. And Waterford's biggest land-use question still awaits its recorded answer.

What We Reviewed

This issue continues the four-county scan: New London and Middlesex Counties in Connecticut, plus Washington and Newport Counties in Rhode Island. As always, the goal is not to summarize every meeting in every town. The goal is to identify the municipal actions most likely to affect land value, housing supply, development feasibility, commercial demand, and long-term planning direction.

The highest-impact items this cycle come from Tiverton, Stonington, Waterford, East Lyme, Groton, Narragansett, New London, Norwich, and Old Saybrook. Westerly, Middletown, and Ledyard hold on the radar. Rankings reflect timing, scale, public engagement, and likely real estate impact.

Meeting & Source Links

Town Meeting Minute is built from municipal agendas, meeting packets, pending-application pages, public hearing notices, plan-update pages, and related reporting. Meeting formats, source links, packet materials, outcomes, and public comment rules may change, so always confirm directly with the municipality before attending or relying on a meeting item.

Tiverton: Seasons Corner Market Special Meeting

Meeting: Tiverton Planning Board — Special Meeting & Public Hearing

Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2026

Item: Seasons Corner Market major land development — preliminary plan review (Colbea Enterprises, LLC)

Tiverton Planning Board Page
Meeting Coverage

Stonington: POCD Adoption Endgame

Body: Stonington Planning & Zoning Commission

Item: 2026–2036 POCD — continued hearing held August 18; confirm adoption status via minutes and the Town's POCD page

Stonington 2026 POCD Page

Groton: September Application Wave

Source: Town of Groton Pending Land Use Applications

Items: SIT26-0003 Credit Union (Approved); SPEC26-0003 Veritable Distillery (Pending); IWA26-0005 The Grange at Mystic; CSP26-0001 Luther Fence; IWA26-0006 Jones Residence

Groton Pending Land Use Applications

Waterford: PL-26-13 Decision Watch

Body: Waterford Planning & Zoning Commission

Item: Town-initiated zoning map amendment, 140 Waterford Parkway South (~188 acres)

Waterford P&Z Agenda Center

East Lyme: After the Withdrawal

Body: East Lyme Planning Commission (regular meetings second Tuesday)

Items: Holmes Road / Nehantic Highlands withdrawal; subdivision regulation revisions

East Lyme Planning Commission Page

Narragansett: Comprehensive Plan Drafting

Source: Comprehensive Plan Update page; regional reporting

Items: Housing and economic diagnosis, urban redevelopment plan, and zoning ordinance under joint review

Narragansett Comprehensive Plan Update

How the Seaport Impact Ranking Works

Each item in Town Meeting Minute is assigned a Seaport Impact Score from 1 to 10. This is not an official municipal score, and it is not a prediction that an application, regulation, policy, or plan will be approved or denied. It is our internal editorial framework for evaluating how much a meeting item could matter to property owners, investors, developers, tenants, and the broader real estate market.

The score is based on six factors: land value, housing supply, development feasibility, commercial demand, regulatory direction, and timing. The higher the score, the more likely the item is to influence market behavior, property positioning, future development potential, or long-term planning strategy.

Land Value

Could this change what a property is worth, how it is marketed, or what a buyer may be willing to pay?

Housing Supply

Could this create, restrict, redirect, or influence future residential units?

Development Feasibility

Could this affect whether a project can realistically be built based on zoning, infrastructure, cost, approvals, or site constraints?

Commercial Demand

Could this affect tenant demand, business expansion, corridor viability, or adaptive reuse potential?

Regulatory Direction

Does this show where the town may be heading on density, conservation, infrastructure, economic development, or housing policy?

Timing

Is there a hearing, vote, approval, appeal period, policy change, funding decision, or application milestone coming soon?

How to read the score: Items scoring above 8 are high-impact signals that may influence broader market direction or future land-use strategy. Items between 6 and 8 are meaningful watch-list items. Items below 6 may still matter locally, but the likely market impact is narrower, more property-specific, or less immediate.

Public hearing room with residents, a presenter, and commission members reviewing a draft plan.
Packed rooms remain the story: Stonington's plan fight and Tiverton's four-year hearing war both come down to what happens at the microphone.

Highest Impact Item

1. Tiverton: Four Years of Litigation Come Down to Tuesday Night

Special Meeting — Tuesday, September 15

Meeting: Tiverton Planning Board • Special Meeting & Public Hearing • September 15, 2026

Project: Seasons Corner Market — Major Land Development, Preliminary Plan Review (Colbea Enterprises, LLC)

Seaport Impact Score: 9.4 / 10 — Very High Impact

View Tiverton Planning Board Page

Read Meeting Coverage

Tiverton takes the top spot for the most concrete reason in this newsletter's history: the hearing is in two days. At its August 4 meeting, the Planning Board voted to open the public hearing on Colbea's preliminary plan at a dedicated September 15 special meeting — a session the board scheduled specifically because of the volume of material and the intensity of public interest in the project.

How We Got Here

The procedural history recited by Colbea's attorney is a case study in coastal entitlement warfare: a 2021 concept review, a 2022 master-plan denial, a zoning board reversal of that denial, a Superior Court ruling upholding the reversal, ten separate hearings on special-use permits, and now a 2026 preliminary-plan filing. An abutter's appeal of the special-use permits remains pending — but with no stay issued, the board's counsel advised that the application must be heard, and the abutter said she would seek a stay. The plan itself has evolved too: the entrance and exit have been reoriented and a drive-through lane added behind the property.

Why This Could Change the Game

Whatever happens Tuesday, this project has already redefined how commercial approval risk gets priced in Newport County. A four-year, litigated path to a preliminary-plan hearing on a 1.2-acre convenience store is a carrying-cost lesson every corridor developer in the region will study.

Seaport Read

Watch three things Tuesday: whether a stay materializes before the gavel, what conditions the board floats, and how the revised site plan handles the traffic concerns that drove the original denial. The answers will tell you whether this ends in weeks or adds another year to the file.

2. Stonington: The Plan Fight Escalates Past Public Comment

Adoption Endgame

Body: Stonington Planning & Zoning Commission

Item: 2026–2036 Plan of Conservation and Development

Seaport Impact Score: 9.2 / 10 — Very High Impact

View Stonington 2026 POCD Page

Follow Westerly Sun Coverage

What began as a routine ten-year plan update has become the region's most contested long-range planning fight. The August 4 hearing drew dozens of residents and ran nearly two hours before being continued to August 18, with SLR's community planner presenting amendments — expanded transit language from New London through Stonington to Westerly, water-quality and coastal-waterway protections, and clean-energy provisions — drafted in direct response to public pressure.

What Happened Since

The debate has now escalated inside town government itself: recent coverage indicates some town officials have argued the plan as drafted would negatively affect hundreds of properties. When the disagreement moves from the microphone to the dais, adoption timing and final language both become genuinely uncertain — and the statute still requires the decade-overdue update to get done.

Why This Matters

Every zoning amendment, subdivision, and land-use decision in Stonington for the next decade will be measured against whatever language survives this fight. In one of the most constrained, highest-value markets in the region, the difference between the May draft and the adopted plan is the difference between two different investment climates.

Seaport Read

Read the final amendments when they post, and pay particular attention to anything touching property-level designations — the "hundreds of properties" claim suggests mapping or classification language, not just policy prose. That is exactly the kind of detail that quietly changes what individual parcels can do.

3. Waterford: The Region's Biggest Open Question Is Still Open

Decision Watch

Body: Waterford Planning & Zoning Commission

Item: PL-26-13 — Town-Initiated Zoning Map Amendment, 140 Waterford Parkway South (~188 acres)

Seaport Impact Score: 8.6 / 10 — High Impact

View Waterford Agenda Center

Read The Day's Coverage

No recorded outcome on the town-initiated rezoning of the former airport property has surfaced in regional reporting since the July 28 hearing — which itself is information. On a parcel this size, silence usually means deliberation, revision, or a decision working its way through minutes that haven't posted.

The Stakes, Restated

The backstory explains why the town took the pen: the property passed to an Arizona court-appointed liquidating trust in a $10 transfer after a federal investigation into a purported $160 million Ponzi scheme that had dangled the site to investors, against a town appraisal of $5.7 million. The developer-led rezoning — trimmed from roughly 750 units to 600 — was rejected amid traffic concerns, even as the town planner's own memo noted multifamily would create mixed-use, village-style opportunity. The parcels could theoretically hold up to 1,500 units. Across I-95 sits the Crystal Mall, where Electric Boat's expansion is expected to concentrate thousands of workers.

Seaport Read

The vote, whenever it lands, defines the negotiating terrain for every future proposal on the region's largest housing-capable parcel. If PL-26-13 passes, the town owns the framework; if it fails, the stalemate deepens on a site whose ownership structure needs a sale to resolve. Either outcome moves value — check the minutes.

4. East Lyme: A Withdrawal Subtracts From the Housing Pipeline

Withdrawn

Body: East Lyme Planning Commission

Item: Holmes Road subdivision — Nehantic Highlands, a General Statutes §8-30g affordable subdivision (Duval Partners, LLC)

Seaport Impact Score: 8.4 / 10 — High Impact

View East Lyme Planning Commission Page

Read the Withdrawal Report

The parcel-level test case we've tracked since Issue #13 is over — for now. Local reporting on East Lyme's September meetings indicates the Holmes Road application was withdrawn on the day of a Planning Commission meeting, with the Zoning Commission chair even questioning whether taking public comment after the withdrawal created legal exposure.

Why This Matters

This was not just any subdivision: Nehantic Highlands was filed under §8-30g, Connecticut's affordable housing appeals statute, which shifts the burden to towns that deny qualifying projects. When an 8-30g application is withdrawn rather than pushed to decision, the usual reasons are engineering economics, regulatory friction, or repositioning for a stronger refiling. Each explanation tells a different story about delivery feasibility in East Lyme — and the answer matters regionally, because 8-30g remains the primary tool for adding affordable supply in high-cost shoreline towns.

Seaport Read

Watch two things: whether the application returns in revised form, and what the concurrently rewritten subdivision regulations look like when adopted. If the new rules materially change infrastructure obligations or lot economics, the withdrawal may prove to have been a pause to re-run the numbers — not a retreat.

5. Groton: The Post-Decision Pipeline Refills

Credit Union Approved New Filings Posted

Source: Town of Groton Pending Land Use Applications

Items: SIT26-0003 Credit Union Branch and Offices, 350 Long Hill Road — Approved; SPEC26-0003 Veritable Distillery Tasting Room, 3 Pearl Street — Pending; plus new September wetlands and coastal filings

Seaport Impact Score: 8.2 / 10 — High Impact

View Groton Pending Applications

A month after the REGA26-0004 denial fixed the Open Space CIC rules as adopted, Groton's pipeline is answering. The credit union branch and offices at 350 Long Hill Road moved from pending to approved — continued reinvestment in a corridor that keeps drawing institutional tenants. The Veritable Distillery tasting room at 3 Pearl Street remains pending, a marker of Mystic's unrelenting hospitality demand. And a September wave of new filings landed on the pending page, including wetlands and coastal site plan applications across town.

Disclosure — On the Record: Groton's pending-application page also lists IWA26-0005, "The Grange at Mystic," a wetlands application for 0 Noank Ledyard Road that includes a phasing plan, drainage report, and wetland reports covering the site and a sewer extension. Seaport Real Estate Services represents a party in a transaction involving this property. Consistent with our editorial policy, we note this item as a matter of public record only, without scoring, analysis, or commentary, and direct readers to the Town's application materials at the link above.

Why This Matters

Groton is doing what healthy land-use markets do after a decision cycle: absorbing the rules and filing under them. The mix — institutional commercial on Long Hill Road, hospitality in downtown Mystic, and residential land moving into agency review — is the broadest application activity of any town in this issue.

Seaport Read

For commercial owners, the Long Hill Road approval and the Mystic tasting-room application are the demand signals to price into 2027 assumptions. For landowners, the lesson of the last two cycles stands: run feasibility against the regulations as adopted, because Groton has shown it will let its frameworks operate as written.

6. Narragansett: A "Town at a Crossroads," In Its Own Consultant's Words

Comprehensive Plan Drafting

Source: Town of Narragansett Comprehensive Plan Update; regional reporting

Seaport Impact Score: 7.8 / 10 — Meaningful Regional Impact

View Narragansett Comprehensive Plan Update

Read Independent RI Coverage

Narragansett's update, facilitated by Weston & Sampson, has produced a draft that reporting describes as a diagnosis of a town at a crossroads — with the sharpest finding being that Narragansett isn't facing a single housing shortage but several distinct housing markets competing for the same limited supply. Layer that onto the affordability gap in the town's own July work-session materials, and the housing chapter of this plan is shaping up as the most consequential document in Washington County.

What Is Coming

The Town Council is reviewing the comprehensive plan alongside two other consequential documents — the urban redevelopment plan and the zoning ordinance — meaning the policy response, when it arrives, could move on three fronts at once.

Seaport Read

When a coastal town's own consultants document seasonal, student, and year-round demand fighting over the same houses, policy follows: rental regulation, density decisions, redevelopment incentives. Investors and rental owners should read the fall drafts as they post, because the strategies chosen will move this market.

7. New London & Norwich: The Money Is Still Moving Into Position

Regional Housing-Finance Watch

Item: Municipal Redevelopment Authority (MRDA) membership and housing growth zones

Seaport Impact Score: 7.4 / 10 — Watch List

Read the Coverage

The MRDA story carries forward from Issue #14: New London and Norwich continue positioning for state bonding funds tied to certified housing growth zones near transit hubs and downtowns — money usable for project gap financing and housing-supporting infrastructure like sewer extensions and flood protection, and not limited to affordable projects.

Seaport Read

The zone boundary is the value line. Owners of underused downtown buildings in both cities should track certification, because parcels inside a certified half-mile radius will carry a financing advantage the parcel across the street won't.

8. Old Saybrook: The Quiet Transition Continues

Housing Policy Watch

Source: Old Saybrook Affordable Housing Plan Progress Report

Item: Housing Growth Plan transition and middle-housing zoning requirements

Seaport Impact Score: 7.0 / 10 — Watch List

View Old Saybrook AHP Progress Report

Old Saybrook holds its watch-list position: the adopted affordable-housing progress report still flags required zoning updates on middle housing and parking restrictions, with the future Housing Growth Plan set to guide strategy. No dramatic cycle-over-cycle change — which remains exactly why Main Street and shoreline mixed-use owners should be studying their parcels now, before the regulation drafts define the possibilities for them.

Other Items on Our Radar

Westerly

Two threads worth watching: the 40-unit housing plan approved in 2024 off Chamber Way and Post Road is reported to be materializing this summer — approved supply actually delivering — and the multi-year Zoning Code Revisions project continues as the structural story on the Rhode Island side.

Middletown

Implementation watch continues on the approved Z2026-4 housing-growth amendments. The tell will be the first applications filed under the new code language this fall — that's when policy becomes projects.

Mystic Seaport Museum (Stonington)

Not a land-use item, but a labor-market marker: Mystic Seaport Museum employees voted to join the country's largest cultural workers union. Institutional employment conditions in the Mystic tourism economy feed directly into local housing demand math.

Ledyard / Portsmouth

Ledyard's governance question — whether to separate its Planning and Zoning Commissions — remains a capacity item. Portsmouth and greater Newport County stay in the scan for housing, military-related demand, and coastal resilience pressure.

Regional planning map of New London, Middlesex, Washington, and Newport Counties with ranked town markers.
The four-county scan, re-ranked: Tiverton's Tuesday hearing takes the top pin.

Issue #15 Impact Rankings

The rankings below are based on potential market impact, not political importance or likelihood of approval. A lower-ranked item may still be highly important to a specific neighborhood, property owner, applicant, or community group.

RankCountyTownItemScoreWhy It Matters
1 Newport RI Tiverton Seasons Corner Market — September 15 Special Hearing 9.4 Four years of litigation culminate in Tuesday's preliminary-plan hearing — the region's clearest lesson in entitlement risk.
2 New London CT Stonington 2026–2036 POCD Adoption Endgame 9.2 The plan fight has moved to the dais, with officials debating impacts on hundreds of properties before a decade-defining adoption.
3 New London CT Waterford 140 Waterford Parkway South — Decision Watch 8.6 The recorded vote on the town-initiated rezoning will set the terms for the region's largest housing-capable parcel.
4 New London CT East Lyme Holmes Road / Nehantic Highlands 8-30g Withdrawal 8.4 An affordable-housing subdivision leaving the pipeline is a supply subtraction with regional feasibility implications.
5 New London CT Groton Post-Decision Pipeline: Approvals & New Filings 8.2 Long Hill Road approval, Mystic hospitality demand, and a September filing wave show the market absorbing the adopted rules.
6 Washington RI Narragansett Comprehensive Plan — "Town at a Crossroads" Draft 7.8 The consultant's diagnosis of competing housing markets will shape rental, density, and redevelopment policy for a decade.
7 New London CT New London & Norwich MRDA Housing Growth Zones 7.4 Zone certification will draw financing-advantage boundaries through both downtowns.
8 Middlesex CT Old Saybrook Middle Housing & Housing Growth Plan Transition 7.0 Middle housing, mixed-use zoning, and parking rules continue their quiet approach toward shoreline redevelopment.
Planning docket with withdrawal and filing records and an open decision slot for the September 15 hearing.
The docket rolls forward: a withdrawal recorded, new filings stamped in, and Tuesday's slot still open.

The Big Picture

Issue #15 confirms something we've argued since this series began: municipal decisions don't end stories, they start them. The Groton denial produced a filing wave under the adopted rules. The East Lyme process produced a withdrawal that subtracts real units from the pipeline. The Stonington hearing produced amendments — and then an escalated fight inside town government itself. And four years of Tiverton litigation produced, finally, a hearing date.

The common thread is motion. Capital, applicants, and opposition groups all reprice their positions the moment a gavel falls, and the towns that decided fastest in August are the ones with the most activity in September.

Seaport Takeaway: Don't just read the decisions — read what filed, what withdrew, and what escalated in the thirty days after. That second wave is where the market tells you what it really thinks the rules mean.

Why We Track This

At Seaport Real Estate Services, we believe the best real estate advice starts before a property hits the market. Municipal agendas, zoning text amendments, map changes, public hearing notices, water and sewer studies, POCD updates, and subdivision regulations often reveal where value is being created, constrained, or redirected.

That is why we read the packets, track the meetings, and look for the connection between public policy and private real estate value.

Disclosure: Seaport Real Estate Services may represent buyers, sellers, or owners of properties affected by matters discussed in this publication. Nothing in Town Meeting Minute should be read as a solicitation, an offer, or advice regarding any specific property or transaction.
Public Access Note: Meeting formats, agenda materials, application documents, hearing dates, public comment rules, voting outcomes, appeal periods, and online links may change. Readers should confirm all meeting details and application statuses directly with the applicable municipality before attending, watching, relying on, or submitting comment on any public meeting.
Posted by Tim Bray on

Enjoy this blog post? Click here to subscribe for updates

Tags

Email Send a link to post via Email

Leave A Comment

e.g. yourwebsitename.com
Please note that your email address is kept private upon posting.